← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 40

Characterising core body temperature response of free-moving C57BL/6 mice to 1.95 GHz whole-body

Share card for Characterising core body temperature response of free-moving C57BL/6 mice to 1.95 GHz whole-body

Keywords

During a 2-h 1.95 GHz whole-body RF-EMF exposure, CBT peaked within the first 16 min relative to sham (+0.15, +0.31, +0.24, +0.37°C at 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5 W/kg, respectively), with statistical significance reported at WBA-SAR ≥ 2.5 W/kg. The elevation largely …

Study snapshot

PublicationBioelectromagnetics · 2024
Study typeanimal
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Characterising core body temperature response of free-moving C57BL/6 mice to 1.95 GHz whole-body radiofrequency-electromagnetic fields Sylvester E, Deng C, McIntosh R, Iskra S, Frankland J, McKenzie R, Croft RJ. Characterising core body temperature response of free-moving C57BL/6 mice to 1.95 GHz whole-body radiofrequency- electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 2024 Oct 14. doi: 10.1002/bem.22527. Highlights • Exposure of 1.95 GHz electromagnetic fields at 5 W/kg whole-body average specific absorption rate increases core body temperature by 0.4°C. • The increased thermal energy at 3.75 W/kg is effectively managed by thermoregulation (max increase = 0.24°C). • An extended habituation period prior to RF-EMF exposure is necessary to account for the large effect of handling on mice core body temperature. Abstract The present study investigated the core body temperature (CBT) response of free-moving adult male and female C57BL/6 mice, during and following a 2-h exposure to 1.95 GHz RF-EMF within custom-built reverberation chambers, using temperature capsules implanted within the intraperitoneal cavity and data continuously logged and transmitted via radiotelemetry postexposure. Comparing RF-EMF exposures (WBA-SAR of 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, and 5 W/kg) to the sham-exposed condition, we identified a peak in CBT within the first 16 min of RF-EMF exposure (+0.15, +0.31, +0.24, +0.37°C at 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, and 5 W/kg respectively; statistically significant at WBA-SAR ≥ 2.5 W/kg only), which largely dissipated for the remainder of the exposure period. Immediately before the end of exposure, only the CBT of the 5 W/kg condition was statistically differentiable from sham. Based on our findings, it is apparent that mice are able to effectively compensate for the increased thermal load at RF-EMF strengths up to 5 W/kg. In addition, the elevated CBT at the end of the exposure period in the 5 W/kg condition was statistically significantly reduced compared to the sham condition immediately after RF-EMF exposure ceased. This would indicate that measures of CBT following the end of an RF-EMF exposure period may not reflect the actual change in the CBT of mice caused by RF-EMF exposure in mice. Open access paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionharm
PopulationFree-moving adult male and female C57BL/6 mice
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · 1950 MHz · 5 W/kg · 2-h exposure
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

During a 2-h 1.95 GHz whole-body RF-EMF exposure, CBT peaked within the first 16 min relative to sham (+0.15, +0.31, +0.24, +0.37°C at 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5 W/kg, respectively), with statistical significance reported at WBA-SAR ≥ 2.5 W/kg. The elevation largely dissipated over the remainder of exposure; immediately before exposure end, only the 5 W/kg condition differed from sham, and CBT immediately after exposure cessation was reported as statistically significantly reduced compared with sham in the 5 W/kg condition.

Outcomes measured

  • Core body temperature (CBT) during exposure
  • CBT following exposure
  • Thermoregulatory response to RF-EMF thermal load

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in provided abstract/metadata
  • Exposure source/context (e.g., device type) not specified beyond reverberation chambers
  • Findings limited to mice (C57BL/6) and a 2-hour exposure duration
  • Handling/habituation effects on CBT noted as large and requiring extended habituation
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 1950,
    "sar_wkg": 5,
    "duration": "2-h exposure"
  },
  "population": "Free-moving adult male and female C57BL/6 mice",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Core body temperature (CBT) during exposure",
    "CBT following exposure",
    "Thermoregulatory response to RF-EMF thermal load"
  ],
  "main_findings": "During a 2-h 1.95 GHz whole-body RF-EMF exposure, CBT peaked within the first 16 min relative to sham (+0.15, +0.31, +0.24, +0.37°C at 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5 W/kg, respectively), with statistical significance reported at WBA-SAR ≥ 2.5 W/kg. The elevation largely dissipated over the remainder of exposure; immediately before exposure end, only the 5 W/kg condition differed from sham, and CBT immediately after exposure cessation was reported as statistically significantly reduced compared with sham in the 5 W/kg condition.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in provided abstract/metadata",
    "Exposure source/context (e.g., device type) not specified beyond reverberation chambers",
    "Findings limited to mice (C57BL/6) and a 2-hour exposure duration",
    "Handling/habituation effects on CBT noted as large and requiring extended habituation"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "RF-EMF",
    "1.95 GHz",
    "whole-body average SAR",
    "WBA-SAR",
    "core body temperature",
    "thermoregulation",
    "reverberation chamber",
    "radiotelemetry",
    "C57BL/6 mice"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "animal-studies",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Experimental RF-EMF exposure study in mice measuring physiological (temperature) response."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/bem.22527
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →